Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 509 SO2D 811 - Sparks v. Ware

Sparks v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Procunier v. Martinez · Pell v. Procunier · Cruz v. Beto · Sweet v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]espite the fact that defendant is incarcerated for violation of the criminal law, he retains his first amendment rights to the extent that they are not "inconsistent with his status as a prisoner or with the legitimate penological objectives of the corrections system." * * * Even prisoners must be afforded reasonable opportunity to exercise their religious freedom. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The first amendment does not allow this relatively minor inconvenience for the prison record keeping system to stand in the way of an inmate's right to express his religion by taking his religious name as his legal name.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The record reveals no reason to believe that appellant's request for a name change is not sincerely motivated by religious convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.