509 So. 2d 917 - State v. Dominguez’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Delva (1991), 697 So. 2d 84 - Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases (1997)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 475 So. 2d 239 - Way v. State · Wiesenberg v. State · 492 So. 2d 1187 - Dominguez v. State · 458 So. 2d 881 - Way v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The defendant knowingly sold, delivered or possessed a certain substance. 2. The substance was cocaine or a mixture containing cocaine. 3. The quantity of the cocaine involved twenty-eight grams or more.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“DOES THE CURRENT STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTION ON TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE SUFFICIENTLY INSTRUCT THE JURY THAT TO CONVICT A DEFENDANT UNDER THE STATUTE ONE OF THE ELEMENTS THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE IS THAT THE DEFENDANT KNEW THAT THE SUBSTANCE IN WHICH HE TRAFFICKED WAS COCAINE?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“4. (Defendant) knew the substance was (specific substance alleged).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.