Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Roche v. Town of Fairfield (1982), Teson v. Vasquez (1977)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Warner · Sandy Ford Ranch, Inc. v. Dill · George v. Crosno · Grimes v. Armstrong · Gates v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A. That plaintiff[’s] claim to the disputed tract and roadway is based upon adverse possession. To acquire title to real estate by adverse possession, and to acquire a right of way by prescription, the claimant must show possession (or use, in case of the right of way) by the claimant and his predecessors in title which is (1) hostile, that is under a claim of right; (Emphasis Ours) (2) actual, (3) Open and notorious; (4) exclusive; and (5) continuous for the necessary period of time prior to the commencement of the action.” (Emphasis in original.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Norman v. Allison“If the possessor occupies the land in question intending to occupy that particular piece as his own, his occupancy is adverse. It is not necessary that he intend to take away from the true owner something which he knows belongs to another, or even that he be indifferent as to the facts of the legal title. It is the intent to possess, and not the intent to take irrespective of his right, which governs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ross v. McNeal““Hostile possession” means possession opposed and antagonistic to the claims of all others, and imports the occupation of land by the possessor with the intent to possess the land as his own.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Krell v. Davidson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.