Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 509 SW2D 233 - Reeves v. Perkins

Reeves v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. United States · 202 F. Supp. 384 - Montellier v. United States · Trounstine v. Bauer, Pogue & Co. · McCord v. Hays · Ledbetter v. Turnpike Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is not necessary to aver the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity or the legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party. When a party desires to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party or the capacity of any party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity, he shall do so by specific negative averment, which shall include such supporting particulars as are peculiarly within the pleader’s knowledge. (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.