Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 509 S.W.2d 617 - Prine v. State

Prine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2009

12 state decisions

701974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 157 Tex. Crim. 276 - Gottschalk v. State · Curry v. State · 111 Tex. Crim. 500 - Littles v. State · Roddy v. State · McTee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Article 3737e V.C.S., by its terms, authorizes proof by the testimony of the entrant, custodian or other qualified witness, `even though he may not have personal knowledge as to the various items or contents of such memorandum or record,' and that `such lack of personal knowledge may be shown to affect the weight and credibility of the memorandum or record but shall not affect its admissibility.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lumpkin v. State
  2. ““The fact that a person who is present when a crime is committed fails to give an alarm, fails to inform on a person he knows to have committed a crime, or conceals his knowledge that a crime has been committed does not make him an accessory.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Easter v. State
  3. “this is so even if the person to whom the false information is given is not a peace officer if done for the purpose of aiding the principal to evade arrest or trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Guevara v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.