¶1ORDER
¶2Denise Jackson appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24. 035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.
¶3An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).