¶1Supreme Court, New York County, rendered May 31, 1973, after a jury trial, convicting the defendant of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, possession of a weapon as a felony, attempt to commit the crime of robbery in the first degree, and attempt to commit the crime of grand larceny in the third degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the convictions on the counts of grand larceny in the third degree, possession of a weapon as a felony, and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, and dismissing those counts of the indictment and as so modified the judgment is affirmed. Those counts which we have dismissed are concededly inclusory concurrent counts; therefore, the conviction of the defendant of the crimes of robbery in the first degree and attempt to commit the crime of robbery in the first degree mandates dismissal of the inclusory concurrent counts (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]; People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784). We have examined the balance of the contentions of the defendant and found them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Birns and Lane, JJ.
51 A.D.2d 689
People v. Mitchell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1976
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1976-02-02
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1986
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1976-02-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →