In Re Stroop’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp. (1988), In the Matter of Jane Marlene Busick, Debtor-Appellee (1987)
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 303
Relies on Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Moser v. United States · In Re All Media Properties, Inc. · United States v. Tibbetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the defense of the alleged debtor to the claim of the petitioning creditor raises material issues of fact or law so that a summary judgment could not be rendered as a matter of law in favor of the creditor on a trial of the claim, the claim is subject to a bona fide dispute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.