51 Cal. 2d 371 - In Re Osslo’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 121 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 53 Cal. 2d 370 - People v. Banks (1959), 66 Cal. 2d 606 - In Re Smiley (1967)
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 121 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 50 Cal. 2d 75 - People v. Osslo · 31 Cal. 2d 801 - In Re Trombley · Osslo v. California · 51 Cal. 2d 177 - In Re Petersen · In Re Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has the right to refuse probation, for its conditions may appear to defendant more onerous than the sentence which might be imposed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““If any defendant who has been released on probation is committed to a prison in this State for another offense, the court which released him on probation shall have jurisdiction to impose sentence, if no sentence has previously been imposed for the offense for which he was granted probation, in the absence of the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. De Waele““ * * * probation essentially calls for continuing supervision of the probationer and maintaining jurisdiction and power in the trial court to act in respect to such supervision.” [Emphasis added] In re Osslo, 51 Cal.2d 371 , 334 P.2d 1, 7 (1958).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.