Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 CALAPP2D 438 - Crandall v. McGrath

Crandall v. McGrath’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 1970
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1970

19 state decisions

1101942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robinson v. Muir · 125 Cal. App. 410 - Amore v. Di Resta · 96 Cal. App. 530 - Tumelty v. Peerless Stages

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the proof of ... negligence and ... proximate cause ... is overwhelming, then the decision of the trial court in confining the new trial to the issue of damages only should not be disturbed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.