51 Cal. App. 4th 547 - Karamzai v. Digitcom’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 195 Cal. App. 3d 606 - Cabrera v. Plager · 28 Cal. App. 4th 1365 - Mentzer v. Hardoin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The denial is based upon the California Supreme Court[ [2] ] holding in ( Karamzai v. Digitcom (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 547, 551 [ 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 139 ]) ... `We conclude that a trial court has no authority to alter the time in which a party must file a request for a de novo trial.' ( Id. at p. 551 [ 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 139 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.