Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 CONNAPP 140 - Gill v. Diorio

Gill v. Diorio’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida · Liberty Mortgage Co. v. Frey · Barde v. Board of Trustees

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Standing is establish by showing that the party claiming it is authorized by statute to bring suit or is classically aggrieved.' Steeneck v. University of Bridgeport , 235 Conn. 572 , 579 , 668 A.2d 688 (1995).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]here a statute or court rule sets prerequisites to suit by a particular plaintiff, a plaintiff not meeting the statutory criteria lacks standing and the court is said to lack jurisdiction over the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Because a party must have standing to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court, it is appropriate for a court to evaluate whether a party has made a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.