Hryniewicz v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Doty v. Shawmut Bank (2000), LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLC (2002)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Connell v. Colwell · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · D.H.R. Construction Co. v. Donnelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To oppose a motion for summary judgment successfully, the nonmovant must recite specific facts in accordance with Practice Book (1998 Rev.) §§ 17-45 and 17-46 . . . which contradict those stated in the movant's affidavits and documents and show that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment shall be entered against him.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he burden of showing the nonexistence of any material fact is on the party seeking summary judgment. . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]ursuant to Practice Book § [10-7], 11 the filing of any pleading provided for by [Practice Book § 10-6 ] will waive the right to file any pleading which might have been filed in due order and which precedes it in the order of pleading provided in that section.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.