Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 CUSTCT 117 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1964
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on John H. Graham & Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Par. 1604. Agricultural implements: Plows, tooth or disk harrows, headers, harvesters, reapers, agricultural drills and planters, mowers, horserakes, cultivators, thrashing machines, cotton gins, machinery for use in the manufacture •of sugar, wagons and carts, cream separators valued at not more than $50 each, and all other agricultural implements of any hind or description, not specially provided for, whether in whole or in parts, including repair parts: Provided, That no article specified by name in Title I shall be free of duty under this paragraph.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “That all articles manufactured wholly or in chief value of chain shall not he subject to a lower rate of duty than that imposed upon the chain of which it is made, or of which chain is the component material of chief value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.