Rosenstein v. Tarr’s Empirical Analysis
51 F. 368 · 1892
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1945
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Pana v. Bowler · In re Washington & Georgetown Railroad · Coghlan v. South Carolina Railroad · Jerome v. McCarter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no doubt that a supersedeas bond, conditioned according to the statute for prosecuting an appeal with effect and answering ail damages and costs, covers not merely compensation for the delay arising from the appeal, but also the amount of the decree appealed from, so far as the latter directs the payment of money by the appellant to the appellee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.