Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 F.1d 424 - Mitchell v. Sharon

Mitchell v. Sharon’s Empirical Analysis

51 F. 424 · 1892

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1970
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Waugh v. Waugh · Zeliff v. Jennings · Gabe v. McGinnis · Hayes v. . Ball · Olmstead v. Koester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Never, and I know very little about her. Prom what I do know, I can only regard her proposition for money for the letters as a blackmailing scheme, pure and simple. I have never received any communication from her, but from what I hear I suppose she has made demands upon the óslate for money. Those demands have not been regarded as anything more than mere talk, the vapid emanations from an idle mind. She will wait a long time before she gets anything out of the Sharon estate for suppressing such information as she may possess. I am often approached by people who talk mysteriously about revealing matters that would be detrimental to the Sharon estate if made public, but I always send them away as soon as they begin to make blackmailing demands.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.