Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 F.3d 265

Docket No. 94-6756.

Wade Ashford v. Edward W. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 14, 1995. Decided April 4, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-04-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bedi v. Grondin

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-04-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Wade Ashford, appellant pro se. Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ashford v. Murray, No. CA-92-1176 (E.D. Va. June 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant's "Motion For Supplemental Pleading To Conform To The Evidence" is denied

/51/f3d/265 · .json · Public domain