Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 F.3d 266

Docket No. 94-6338.

Ferguson v. Lamb

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 15, 1995. Decided March 29, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1999

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Fulgham v. Webster

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin Ferguson, appellant pro se. W. Howard Boyd, Jr., Edwin Pruitt Martin, Jr., Gibbes & Clarkson, P.A., Greenville, SC, for appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ferguson v. Lamb, No. CA-92-839-7-18BD (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/51/f3d/266 · .json · Public domain