Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 F.3d 267

Docket No. 94-7102.

Pierce v. Kearney

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 15, 1995. Decided: April 3, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-04-03

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Dorothy P. Litzenberg

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-04-03

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. LaVee Hamer, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Kearney, No. CA-93-113-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 1993 and Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/51/f3d/267 · .json · Public domain