51 F.3d 268 - Michael Sewell Smith v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Michael Sewell Smith v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Michael Sewell Smith v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Michael Sewell Smith v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Michael Sewell Smith v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Michael Sewell Smith v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

Michael Sewell SMITH, Petitioner-v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-
Michael Sewell SMITH, Petitioner-v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-
Michael Sewell SMITH, Petitioner-v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 21, 1995. Decided April 4, 1995.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Sewell Smith, appellant pro se. Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Angelone, Nos. CA-91-503-N; CA-91-504-N; CA-91-505-N (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.