Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 F.3d 268

Docket No. 95-6119.

Thomas v. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 15, 1995. Decided April 11, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Wright v. Collins · United States v. Terry Renee Boyd

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James William Thomas, appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Jeff Wayne Rosen, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Murray, No. CA-94-244 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED..

/51/f3d/268 · .json · Public domain