Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 F.3d 277

Docket No. 94-2784.

Angela D. Harbin v. Hypermart USA

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Mar. 23, 1995. Filed: Mar. 29, 1995.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-29

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Morrison v. Olson · Robert Schmid v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America · Meroney v. Delta International Machinery Corp.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-29

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Angela D. Harbin appeals the district court's1 judgment in favor of defendant Hypermart, at the close of plaintiff's evidence at a bench trial in her Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-2, race discrimination action. On appeal, Harbin challenges the district court's findings and conclusions, but has not provided a copy of the trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). Thus, we are unable to review her arguments on appeal. See Meroney v. Delta Int'l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir. 1994); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

¶2

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.2 See Fed. R. App. P. 3(a); 8th Cir. R. 3C.

1

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

2

Appellee's motion to strike a portion of appellant's brief is denied

/51/f3d/277 · .json · Public domain