Walker v. Cadle Co.’s Empirical Analysis
51 F.3d 562 · 1995
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Zale Corporation Feld v. Zale Corporation (1995), Arnold v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
22 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 151 (Bankruptcy Amendments) · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Celotex Corporation v. Edwards · Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc. · Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union · Finley v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Each district court may provide that any or all cases under title 11 and any or all proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under title 11 shall be referred to the bankruptcy judges for the district.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'it is necessary only to determine whether a matter is at least "related to”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.