Jain v. Mere’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Industrial Risk Insurers Isi v. Man Gutehoffnungshutte Holland & Knight E, Jacada Ltd Client/server Technology Ltd v. International Marketing Strategies Inc
2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mandate[ ] that any commercial arbitral agreement, unless it is between two United States citizens, involves property located in the United States, and has no reasonable relationship with one or more foreign states, falls within the Convention”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Industrial Risk Insurers, Barnard & Burk Group, Inc., Barnard and Burk Engineers and Constructors, Inc., Isi, Inc., American Home Assurance Co., Defendants-Third-Party v. M.A.N. Gutehoffnungshutte Gmbh, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Holland & Knight, Mark E. Grantham v. Industrial Risk Insurers, Barnard & Burk Group, Inc., Barnard and Burk Engineers and Constructors, Inc., Isi, Inc., American Home Assurance Co., Defendants-Third-Party · 49 F. Supp. 2d 331 - Satcom International Group PLC v. Orbcomm International Partners, L.P.“for an order directing that such arbitration proceed in the manner provided for in such agreement.... The court shall hear the parties, and upon being satisfied that the making of the agreement for arbitration or the failure to comply therewith is not in issue, the court shall make an order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The hearing and proceedings, under such agreement, shall be within the district in which the petition for an order directing such arbitration is filed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“creates a strong presumption in favor of arbitration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.