Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 F.3d 775 - Markmueller v. Case

Markmueller v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2016

7 federal appellate ·

80199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Salve Regina College v. Russell · Swanson Humphrey III v. J Buckley · Ronollo v. Jacobs · Electrical Workers, Local No. 1 Credit Union v. IBEW-NECA Holiday Trust Fund · Townsend v. Townsend

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o the extent of the settlor’s beneficial interest in the trust assets, if at the time the trust was established or amended: (a) The settlor was the sole beneficiary of either the income or principal of trust or retained the power to revoke or amend the trust; or (b) The settlor was one of a class of beneficiaries and retained a right to receive a specific portion of the income or principal of the trust that was determinable solely from the provisions of the trust instrument. ..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “because the trust was settled with tenancy by the entirety property, the settlor was the unity of Conrad and Emily Markmueller [the husband and wife].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the right to exercise dominion or control over trust assets.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.