Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 F.3d 86 - United States v. Barrett

United States v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

51 F.3d 86 · 1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
June 2010
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2010

13 federal appellate ·

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663

Relies on Optimal Data Corp. v. United States · United States v. Holiusa · United States v. Marlatt · No. 91-1617 · United States v. Daddona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ommon sense dictates that when an employee acts to the detriment of his employer and in violation of the law, his actions normally will be deemed to fall outside the scope of his employment and thus will not be imputed to his employer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.