Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 F.3d 96 - Green v. Shalala

Green v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

51 F.3d 96 · 1995

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Sarchet v. Chater (1996), Diaz v. Chater (1995)

31 federal appellate · 1 district ·

490199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 5565 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co. · Gardebring v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “track the ALJ's reasoning and be assured that the ALJ considered the important evidence”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Sharon L. Nelson v. Shirley S. Chater · Linda Godbey v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
  2. “presents considerable proof to counter the agency's position, the ALJ must articulate, at some minimal level, his analysis of the evidence;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Linda Godbey v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Diaz v. Chater
  3. ““Substantial evidence” has been defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 27 F. Supp. 2d 1097 - Aidinovski v. Apfel · Knight v. Chater

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.