¶1 Gil Daughtry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Daughtry has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Daughtry, Nos. CR-00-170-A; CA-01-1786-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 7, 2002; entered Aug. *446 8, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED.