Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 FEDCL 638 - Wright v. United States

Wright v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2003
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1498

Relies on MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · Warner-Jenkinson Company Inc v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co · Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc. · Mannesmann Demag Corp. v. Engineered Metal Products Co. · Alpex Computer Corporation v. Nintendo Company Ltd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A detonator net weapon comprising: (a) a net comprising spaced, interwoven, alternating lengths of plastic rope and detonator cord that define a polygonal body including an edge, (b) said plastic rope imparting strength to the net, (c) control packages secured to the edge of said net, and (d) said control packages including means to ignite said detonator cord so that said cord will explode with significant force.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Tr.” for trial transcript; "Hr’g” for closing argument hearing; "Stip.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “for the parties' joint stipulations filed on June 20, 2000;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.