Gregory v. Hershey’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3806
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““2. The prerequisites to a class action as set forth in Rule 23(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied, in that the class being represented is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, there are questions of law and fact common to the class, the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and the representative parties will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class; “3. The prosecution of separate actions, by individual members of the class would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications, which Rule 23(b) (1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure seeks to avoid, with respect to individual members of the class, would establish incompatible standards ' of conduct for the defendants, and such incompatible standards make declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole appropriate; “4. The defendants have acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final relief in the nature of mandamus and corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole, as contemplated by Rule 23(b) (2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure; and that “5. Notification of members of the class is impractical because of the number of members and the absence of any reasonable way of identifying them; therefore “It is hereby ordered, that the above cause of action shall be allowed to be maintained as a class action. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitmore v. Tarr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.