Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 KANAPP2D 928 - State v. Parry

State v. Parry’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Ashe v. Swenson · In the Matter of Jensen · 6 Kan. App. 2d 688 - State v. Puckett · State v. Puckett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he doctrine of law of the case prevents a party from serially litigating an issue already presented and decided on appeal in the same proceeding. The doctrine promotes judicial efficiency while allowing litigants a full and fair opportunity to present their arguments on a point-the first bite of the proverbial apple.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]nce an issue is decided by the [appellate] court, it should not be relitigated or reconsidered unless it is clearly erroneous or would cause manifest injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.