Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 LAANN 1317 - State v. Fuselier

State v. Fuselier’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1976

9 state decisions

30189919001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that the court has in itself to decide when to discharge the jury. The exercise of such discretion is not ordinarily subject to review.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.