Commonwealth v. Albert’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Hoffa v. United States · United States v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Albert’s appeal can be disposed of simply on the basis that he has no standing to raise the invalidity of Shaw’s arrest and the seizure of drugs.”); State v. Valenti, 772 A.2d 127, 130 (R.I. 2001) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No unanimity instruction was required because a conspiracy refers to a continuing course of conduct, rather than a succession of clearly detached incidents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.