Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 Minn. 253

Tipper v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 11, 1892

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1892-11-11

Appeal by defendant Cyrus Eitchie, from an order of the Municipal Court of the City of St. Paul, Twohy, J., made June 18, 1892, refusing a new trial. This action was commenced in a Justice Court of the city of St. .Paul, by the plaintiff George H. Tipper, to recover of the defendant the sum of $36.07, alleged to be due plaintiff for horseshoeing done by the firm of Simons & Bowers and Simons & Tipper, who had assigned their claim to plaintiff.

Decided 1892-11-11

Per Curiam.

¶1On the evidence presented upon a trial in the court below without a jury findings of fact were made, and judgment ordered in plaintiff’s favor for the amount in controversy. The alleged error on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the findings. The evidence was not very clear, and, perhaps, not very convincing, but from an examination we are of the opinion that there was enough to justify the findings of fact as made by the trial, trial court.

¶2Order refusing a new trial affirmed.

¶3{Opinion published 53 N. W. Rep. 547.)

/51/minn/253 · .json · Public domain