Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 MO 136 - Powers v. Hurmert

Powers v. Hurmert’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1988

3 state decisions

20187218801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Relation is sometimes allowed to prevent injustice, as when an attachment has been issued and levied without sufficient affidavit, and an amended .affidavit is afterwards made it will relate back so as to uphold the attachment and uphold the previous levy. But, in that case, the right to the attachment and its levy existed at the time, and only lacked the formality of a sufficient affidavit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.