Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 MO 69 - Marx v. Fore

Marx v. Fore’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
8
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably Lieber v. Lieber (1911), Brown v. Trent (1912)

26 state decisions

5018721880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Christmas v. Russell · Starbuck v. Murray · Kerr v. . Kerr · Pearce v. Olney · Rape v. Heaton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “citizens are not driven to foreign states to protect their rights. If they have a legal right, or are being subjected to a wrong, they may look for protection to the tribunal having jurisdiction over them and the subject-matter, if the opposite party has placed himself within this jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.