Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.C. App. 613 - State v. Williams

51 N.C. App. 613 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2003

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

150198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · Wade v. Hunter · Patterson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a basic precept of the common law, guaranteed by the Federal and State Constitutions, that no person may be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb for the same offense. U.S. Const. Amend. V; N.C. Const. Art. 1, § 19; State v. Cameron, 283 N.C. 191 , 195 S.E. 2d 481 (1973); State v. Cooley, 47 N.C. App. 376 , 268 S.E. 2d 87 , appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 96 , 273 S.E. 2d 442 (1980). A defendant’s cherished right to have his liberty or life legally imperilled only once for a criminal charge does not, however, necessarily preclude retrial when previous proceedings against him have failed to conclude in a judgment of either conviction or acquittal. Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 , 98 S.Ct. 824 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 717 (1978). See generally Annot., 50 L.Ed. 2d 830 . 841-42 (1978); 21 Am. Jur. 2d Criminal Law § 194, at 246 (1965).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.