Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 NEB 301 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
10
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Messino (1930), Bartley v. State (1898)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 55 state decisions — followed in 10 states

16018971900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In case a jury shall be discharged on account of sickness of a juror, or other accident or calamity requiring their discharge, or after they have been kept so long together that there is no probability of agreeing, the court shall, upon directing the discharge, order that the reasons for such discharge shall be entered upon the journal; and such discharge shall be without prejudice to the prosecution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This was sufficient to make the evidence competent, and it was for the jury to consider the place where the displacement of the fixtures occurred and the place where the experiment was made and then to give such weight to the testimony of the state’s witness who made the experiment as they thought it deserved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.