Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.J. Super. 90 - Greenberg v. Stanley

51 N.J. Super. 90 - Greenberg v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2018

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

701958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowman v. Williams · Resavage v. Davies · State v. De Paola · Hartman v. City of Brigantine · 42 N.J. Super. 247 - Hartman v. City of Brigantine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [Plaintiff's] entire physical and mental condition was directly attributable to the accident, that her disabilities constituted an integral situation in which the sudden, unexpected and severe physical trauma was inextricably intertwined with the emotional shock over the simultaneous fatal injury to the infant and that damages were recoverable for her entire resulting injuries and disturbances. [ 51 N.J. Super. at 105-106 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not a case of emotional disturbance resulting from merely witnessing the fatal injury of a child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the accident, the injury, the whole constellation. It wasn't just the death of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.