Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.M. 113 - Bell v. Lammon

Bell v. Lammon’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
4
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall Partners (1991), Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc. v. Newco Industries, Inc. (1972)

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions

21019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hansbrough v. Peck · Berrendo Irrigated Farms Co. v. Jacobs · Alford v. Rowell · Locke v. Murdoch · Dunken v. Guess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a parol contemporaneous agreement be the inducing cause of the written contract, or forms a part of the consideration therefor, and it appears the writing was executed on the faith of the parol agreement or representation, extrinsic evidence is admissible. In such cases, the real basis for its admission is to show fraud.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The law is that where a vendee undertakes to make investigation of his own, and is given full means to ascertain all the facts, and is not prevented from making the examination as full as he likes, he cannot be heard to complain because he relied upon representations of the vendor if his purchase proves unsuccessful.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.