Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.M. 180 - Williams v. Waller

Williams v. Waller’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1994

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

40194719501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on El Dorado Ice & Planing Mill Co. v. Kinard · Van Deren v. Heineke & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There must be mutuality of obligation to support a contract and what it might suit her [plaintiff's] fancy to pay is not sufficient to support an action for its breach. [ 51 N.M. at 184 , 181 P.2d at 800 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.