Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.M. 36 - Mares v. Kool

Mares v. Kool’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp. (1995), State Ex Rel. Transcontinental Bus Service, Inc. v. Carmody (1949)

29 state decisions

11019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper v. Reynolds · Hunt v. . Hunt · Lange v. . Benedict · Clayton v. State · Miller v. Rowan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Municipal corporations shall have power to make and publish, from time to time, ordinances not inconsistent with the laws of the state, for carrying into effect or discharging the powers and duties conferred by law, and such as shall seem necessary and proper to provide for the safety, preserve the health, promote the prosperity, improve the morals, order, comfort and convenience of such corporation and the inhabitants thereof, and to enforce obedience to such ordinances by fines not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300), or by imprisonment not exceeding ninety (90) days, by suit or prosecution before any justice of the peace within the limits of such city or town.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘It shall be unlawful for any person while in an intoxicated condition caused by the use of alcohol, drugs, narcotics, and any other cause whatever, to operate, or attempt to operate, a vehicle upon any street or any public way in the City of Albuquerque.’ * * * “ '* * * Local authorities may also adopt and enforce ordinances, not in conflict with the provisions of this act, relative to the operation of vehicles upon the highways within their respective jurisdictions.’ ” Laws 1929, ch. 75, section 32.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““We adhere to the rule announced in City of Clovis v. Dendy, supra, that an ordinance may duplicate or complement statutory regulations, when authorized by the Legislature, and we conclude that the statutes quoted above authorized the City of Albuquerque to enact the ordinance in question.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.