Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 N.M. 377

185 P.2d 298

Stalcup v. Ruzic

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1947

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1947-08-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1947-08-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1987 · most notably Smith v. Meadows (1952), Garrett v. Howden (1963)

30 state decisions

9019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 On Motion for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

¶2 The appeal is before the court on motion for rehearing filed by the appellant. Examination and consideration thereof satisfy us that all questions argued in appellant’s brief have been passed upon and correctly resolved in the opinion heretofore filed, with one exception. Counsel reminds us that there was no supersedeas bond filed in connection with this appeal. Hence, the direction that upon remand judgment be entered against the surety on appellant’s supersedeas bond is erroneous and the direction as to the entry of judgment against the surety on a supersedeas bond contained in the original opinion should be withdrawn. The judgment will simply stand affirmed. Except for this correction, the opinion as written and filed remains unchanged and the motion for rehearing is denied.

¶3 It is so ordered.

BRICE, C. J., and COMPTON, J., did not participate. HENSLEY, D. J., dissents.
/51/nm/377 · .json · Public domain