Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.M. 441 - Fowler v. W. G. Const. Co.

Fowler v. W. G. Const. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 1990
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1990

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

40194719501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co. · Pound v. Gaulding · Henly v. Oklahoma Union R. Co. · O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co. · Consolidated Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial Com.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to executions for any amount already due in the judgment, executions for amounts to become due in the future shall be issued by the clerk of the court at any time after the time provided in the judgment for the payment thereof, if the workman files his affidavit with the clerk that the same is unpaid and that his disability still continues; provided, however, if application is made for a physical examination of the workman under Section 52-1-51 NMSA 1978, issuance of execution shall await the further order of the court in [on] the premises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"... [A]n injured workman will be denied compensation for an incapacity which may be removed or modified by an operation of a simple character, not involving serious suffering or danger. A refusal to undergo an operation under such circumstances is deemed unreasonable... . On the other hand, if the operation be of a major character and attended with serious risk to life or member, the rule is that an injured employee's refusal to submit to such operation is deemed not unreasonable, and compensation should not be denied on that account. .. ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.