Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 N.M. 5 - Bunton v. Hull

Bunton v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc. (1987), State v. Padilla (1959)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

13019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Keir v. Trager · Roscoe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. · 127 Ohio St. 147 - Morris v. Bloomgreen · Campbell v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co. · Snodgrass v. Turner Tourist Hotels, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Vehicle approaching or entering intersection. — (a) The driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection shall yield the right of way to a vehicle which has entered the intersection from a different highway. "(b) When two [2] vehicles enter an intersection from different highways at approximately the same time the driver of the vehicle on the left shall yield the right of way to the vehicle on the right. "(c) The right of way rules declared in paragraphs (a) and (b) are modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in this article [64-18-27 to 64-18-31]." [Emphasis added].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Whether an expert witness is qualified to give an opinion is a matter which is peculiarly within the discretion of the trial court, and unless that discretion has been abused this court will not disturb the ruling in refusing such testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.