Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 NY2D 417 - People v. Shinkle

People v. Shinkle’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
9
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably State v. Camacho (1991), State v. Pennington (1993)

31 state decisions

15019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The fact that the attorney who had initially represented defendant and participated actively in the preparation of his defense was chief assistant in the office of the prosecutor in the months preceding and during defendant’s trial inescapably gave both defendant and the public the unmistakable appearance of impropriety and created the continuing opportunity for abuse of confidences entrusted to the attorney ***. It is no answer that defendant offers no evidentiary proof of actual prejudice. In the circumstances such proof would most likely be out of defendant’s reach.” Shinkle, 51 N.Y.2d at 420-21 , 415 N.E.2d at 910 , 434 N.Y.S.2d at 920 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"This circumstance . .. affords no basis to deny defendants the right to both the fact and appearance of unswerving and exclusive loyalty on the part of attorneys who represent them.” Id. at 911.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.