51 Ohio App. 2d 31 - State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably 125 Ohio App. 3d 456 - State v. Swiger (1998), 140 Ohio App. 3d 554 - State v. Garretson (2000)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Wilson · Diaz v. United States · Waller v. Florida · Grafton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The applicable rule under the Fifth Amendment is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not. A single act may be an offense against two statutes, and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other. (Blockburger v. United States, 284 U. S. 299 , and Duvall v. Sate, 111 Ohio St. 657 , followed.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris““(A) No person, in. attempting or committing a theft offense as, defined in section 2913.01 of the Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after such attempt or offense, shall use or threaten the immediate use of force against another.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“[i]f the court over the objection of the State dismisses an indictment, information, or complaint, it shall state on the record its findings of fact and reasons for the dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.