51 Ohio App. 3d 190 - State v. Bunyan’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State ex rel. Master v. City of Cleveland (1996), State v. Broughton (1991)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bickerstaff · 13 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Sabbah · State ex rel. Williams v. Zaleski · 123 Ohio St. 474 - State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Henderson · 52 Ohio App. 2d 361 - State v. Stephens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The time within which an accused must be brought to trial, or, in the case of felony, to preliminary hearing and trial, may be extended only by the following: “(E) Any period of delay necessitated by reason of a plea in bar or abatement, motion, proceeding, or action made or instituted by the accused.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Broughton“It is evident from a reading of [R.C. 2945.72 (E)] that a motion to dismiss acts to toll the time in which a defendant must be brought to trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.