Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 OHIOST2D 86 - State v. Stewart

State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

1,012
cited by 1,012 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

1,009 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,012 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Nero (1990), State v. Veney (2008)

1,009 state decisions

4480197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Juidice v. Vail · G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · 58 Ill. 2d 187 - People v. Krantz · State v. Stone

Cited together with State v. Nero · State v. Ballard · State v. Veney · Strickland v. Washington · State v. Engle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,012 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(2) In felony cases the court may refuse to accept a plea of guilty or a plea of no contest, and shall not accept such plea without first addressing the defendant personally and: "(c) Informing him and determining that he understands that by his plea he is waiving his rights to jury trial, to confront witnesses against him, to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to require the state to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial at which he cannot be compelled to testify against himself.””
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The test is whether the plea would have otherwise been made.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Informing the defendant and determining that the defendant understands that by the plea the defendant is waiving the rights to jury trial, to confront witnesses against him or her, to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in the defendant's favor, and to require the state to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial at which the defendant cannot be compelled to testify against himself or herself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.