State v. Bistricky’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
136 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 66 Ohio App. 3d 395 - State v. Bistricky (1990), Adkins v. McFaul (1996)
136 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · Storer v. Brown · State v. Keeton · State v. Fisher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] court of appeals has discretionary authority pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 (A) to review substantive law rulings made in a criminal case which result in a judgment of acquittal so long as the judgment itself is not appealed.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“capable of repetition yet evading review.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“A prosecuting attorney * * * may appeal by leave of the court to which *Page 3 the appeal is taken any other decision, except the final verdict, of the trial court in a criminal case * * *.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Golsby · In re M.M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.